Did OJ do it???

just wanted to know what you guys thought.

do you think oj did it or not?


i KNOW he did. haha

Garbage post. Minus infinity internet points.

You KNOW he did based on what facts?
I take it you have facts to back up you "knowledge" since you made the thread.

The book he wrote basically admits it from the parts I heard. Don't know if it's accurate though.

Quick question...who gives a ****?

banned from SG wrote:

Quick question...who gives a ****?

Hit it right on the head

I only agree with two posts in this thread:

banned from SG wrote:

Quick question...who gives a ****?

Aken wrote:

Garbage post. Minus infinity internet points.

^So you don't agree with your own post stating that you agree with the other posts?

^^Haha, that's funny

HE didn't do it ... He paid to have it done

I think he did. But it's beside the point now. He got away with a crime once, he should not have pulled that stunt in Las Vegas last year. what an idiot.

Wait, what year is it? I feel like its 1995 again or something

I think he did it....

But he got off and then goes out and comits a serious felony with a weapon, multiple witnesses and admits to it. How dumb can one person be?

The_Mastor wrote:

^So you don't agree with your own post stating that you agree with the other posts?

bad venge wrote:

HE didn't do it ... He paid to have it done

Yeah, because that's how you leave one of your gloves behind, and how you leave behind shoe impressions from the sort of very expensive shoes you wear, and how you cut your hand and leave blood behind at the crime scene......by paying someone else to do it....

he and ray lewis shou;d have been in jail a very long time ago.

How are you found not guilty for murder in a criminal court, but guilty of "wrongful death" in a civil court?

Brandon wrote:

How are you found not guilty for murder in a criminal court, but guilty of "wrongful death" in a civil court?

In a criminal case, the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt". Key word being REASONABLE, not "shadow of a". Apparently, some people do not understand this.

In a civil case, the standard of proof is "a preponderance of evidence".

The exclusionary rule does not apply to civil cases. No evidence is "thrown out."

Damn Joe Brown

mccook8 wrote:

bad venge wrote: HE didn't do it ... He paid to have it done Yeah, because that's how you leave one of your gloves behind, and how you leave behind shoe impressions from the sort of very expensive shoes you wear, and how you cut your hand and leave blood behind at the crime scene......by paying someone else to do it....

I bet he WAS there watching ... just doubt he has the guts to do it ...